2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress distribution of mine roof with the boundary element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger k is, the more violently the drum torque fluctuates. For the purpose of evaluating the cutting efficiency of the drum in different conditions, the specific energy (SE) [27,28] in experiment and simulation was calculated by Eq. (6).…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger k is, the more violently the drum torque fluctuates. For the purpose of evaluating the cutting efficiency of the drum in different conditions, the specific energy (SE) [27,28] in experiment and simulation was calculated by Eq. (6).…”
Section: Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective parameters on the underground tunnel stability were evaluated by Panji et al [45]. Wu et al [81] exhibited the stress distribution in subsurface structures. In another study, Panji et al [48] analyzed the stability of shallow tunnels subjected to eccentric loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of computer technology, numerical simulation has been used in recent years to study the stability of surrounding rock in mining. Several models, such as finite element models (FEMs) [16], boundary element models (BEMs) [17], and discrete element models (DEMs) [18], have been proposed for numerical simulation, and all three methods have advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%