2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress distribution of implant retained obturators using different types of attachments: A three dimensional finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 In the present study, data were obtained from the abutment, dental implant, and bone tissue, while Takashi et al provided data only from dental implants. Amer et al 28 compared ball and magnet attachments in dental implant-retained obturators and reported higher stresses in magnet attachments in a way to support findings of the present study.…”
Section: A B C D E F G Hsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…9 In the present study, data were obtained from the abutment, dental implant, and bone tissue, while Takashi et al provided data only from dental implants. Amer et al 28 compared ball and magnet attachments in dental implant-retained obturators and reported higher stresses in magnet attachments in a way to support findings of the present study.…”
Section: A B C D E F G Hsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Milled bar attachment significantly increases prosthesis retention [ 5 ]. Amer et al [ 23 ] evaluated the stress distribution in implant-supported obturators with different attachment designs. They concluded that the best stress distribution was observed in ball and socket and magnet attachments, followed by bar and clip attachments, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implant was established using UGNX10.0 software and was assembled with bone tissue in the model using Boolean subtraction 18 . The interface between the implant and the bone tissue was defined as "tie-constraint "to simulate bone formation for osseointegration 19,20 . Moreover, it was also very difficult to reconstruct trabecular microstructure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material parameters used for cortical bone and cancellous bone are presented in Supplementary Table 1. The interface between bone and implant was defined as "tie-constraint" to simulate good osseointegration 19,20 (Fig. 3C).…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Model Of the Implant And Surrounding Bomentioning
confidence: 99%