2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.113749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress-based and robust topology optimization for thermoelastic multi-material periodic microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microstructures with high stiffness, robust strength, and unique thermal expansion properties were obtained in their works. 33 Recently, stress-constrained multiscale topology optimization has attracted much attention. Pasini et al studied stress-constrained topology optimization problems for lattice materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microstructures with high stiffness, robust strength, and unique thermal expansion properties were obtained in their works. 33 Recently, stress-constrained multiscale topology optimization has attracted much attention. Pasini et al studied stress-constrained topology optimization problems for lattice materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alacoque et al studied the robust topology optimization of the multi‐material microstructure under stress constraints and thermal load. Microstructures with high stiffness, robust strength, and unique thermal expansion properties were obtained in their works 33 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 The use of various AM techniques in conjunction with topology optimization has led to introducing the concept of architectured cellular structures for optimized properties under various operational conditions. 42,43 However, despite an accurate finish, the material properties of the additively manufactured cellular structures are affected by different printing parameters such as laser speed, thermal stresses, and build orientation. Such parameters must be considered for the optimal design of these components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using numerical homogenization instead of traditional relative density functions allows considering the effects of material anisotropies and furthermore computing macroscopic elastic properties for more complex patterns and cell topologies. 43,45 As for the fracture criterion, the MPS is formulated for anisotropic domains by considering the effect of T-stress (the first nonsingular term in continuum crack tip stress fields) as well as the stress intensity factors (SIFs). The proposed framework is examined against results obtained by the direct finite element analysis (FEA) (i.e., where the stress components are obtained directly from finite element [FE] results) and the effects of different cell topologies on the fracture behavior are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty-oriented approaches are divided into robust TO (RTO) [17] and reliability-based TO (RBTO) [18]. The RTO handles the uncertainties through constructing a comprehensive performance function in terms of their mean and standard deviation [19][20][21], while the RBTO brings the reliability theory, i.e., integrating the reliability index or failure probability, into the optimization framework [22,23]. Obviously, more precise layout may be achieved using the RBTO strategy because the structural performance is measured to control the uncertainty influence in every iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%