1987
DOI: 10.1177/008124638701700406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stress and the Industrial Relations Process: Development of the Industrial Relations Event Scale

Abstract: Although organizational stress has been the focus of much attention, there is a paucity of research on the stress associated with involvement in industrial relations. This article outlines the development of the Industrial Relations Event Scale (IRES), a measure designed to assess stressful events associated with the practice of industrial relations. The format of the IRES allows for the measurement of the occurrence, desirability, and perceived impact of each item. Testretest reliability and internal consiste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In four items, the word 'Britain' was changed to 'South Africa'. IR stress was assessed using the negative impact scale of the the Industrial Relations Event Scale-Short Form (IRES-S) (Bluen, 1986;Bluen & Barling, 1987). The IRES-S assesses stressful events associated with the practice of IR.…”
Section: Measuring Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In four items, the word 'Britain' was changed to 'South Africa'. IR stress was assessed using the negative impact scale of the the Industrial Relations Event Scale-Short Form (IRES-S) (Bluen, 1986;Bluen & Barling, 1987). The IRES-S assesses stressful events associated with the practice of IR.…”
Section: Measuring Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the present study, suitable levels of reliability were found (see Table 2). Also, except for the ROCI-I, the scales have been used previously with comparable samples (see Bluen & Barling, 1987;Bluen & Donald, 1987;Cook et al, 1981;Fullagar, 1986).…”
Section: Measuring Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations