“…In the FOBT, a constant state of transverse shear strain is assumed that does not satisfy the zero shear stress condition at the top and bottom edges of the beam and thus requires a shear correction factor to compensate for this error (see, e.g., Wang et al, 2000;Eisenberger, 2003;Civalek and Kiracioglu, 2010;Lin and Zhang, 2011;Endo, 2016). In general, the HOBTs adopt a specific function (parabolic, trigonometric, exponential, or hyperbolic) to more accurately represent the shear stress distribution along the beam's thickness and do not require the shear correction factor (see e.g., Reddy, 1984;Heyliger and Reddy, 1988;Khdeir and Reddy, 1997;Murthy et al, 2005;Vo and Thai, 2012;Pawar et al, 2015;Nguyen et al, 2017;Srinivasan et al, 2019). The literature contains a plethora of publications on the subject, and the interested reader is referred to the excellent review paper of Liew et al (2019).…”