2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streptococcus gallolyticus – A potentially neglected pathogen causing neonatal sepsis not covered by routine group B streptococcus screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyzed the remaining 30 cases of neonatal S. gallolyticus infections reported in literature before November 30, 2021, and the present case ( n = 31) ( Table 1 ). 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Of the 30 cases reported in literature, only 10 cases were reported from the United States. 10 13 14 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed the remaining 30 cases of neonatal S. gallolyticus infections reported in literature before November 30, 2021, and the present case ( n = 31) ( Table 1 ). 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Of the 30 cases reported in literature, only 10 cases were reported from the United States. 10 13 14 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical symptoms of neonatal Streptococcus gallolyticus infections vary and include respiratory distress, apnea, mixed metabolic and respiratory acidosis, fever, lethargy, poor feeding, and seizures. 14,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Interestingly, early onset S. gallolyticus infections were more likely to be associated with meningitis than were late-onset infections. Among the cases in which further identification was performed, Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A MEDLINE search identified 13 cases of neonatal meningitis attributed to Streptococcus gallolyticus between the time period of 2019 and 2023. Cases that lacked a clear identification or were attributed only to "Streptococcus bovis" (S. bovis) without further differentiation were excluded from the analysis, leaving nine cases 14,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] for evaluation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 26 articles reported 66 cases [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. For reasons of completeness, we decided to include in our review three cases of neonatal infection caused by S. bovis biotype II, since, according to the bibliography, neonatal infections caused by S. gallolyticus species (i.e., S. bovis biotype II/2) are much more common than neonatal infections caused by S. infantarius (i.e., S. bovis biotype II/1).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%