2011
DOI: 10.18060/959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths-based Practice and Motivational Interviewing

Abstract: There has been recent concern that many practices and programs erroneously claim to be strengths-based. In reaction some have called for researchers to make systematic comparisons to the tenets of strengths-based practice (SBP) before making the contention that an intervention is strengths-based. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an intervention which has been described as being strengths-based; however, no systematic efforts have yet been made to compare the two. This article takes a methodical approach to co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in response to MI's growing evidence, use, and demand among employers, funders, and some state regulators (Miller, Forcehimes, & Zweben, 2011). MI fits well with social work values (Hohman, 2012;Manthey, Knowles, et al, 2011), and training in MI provides students with concrete tools for engaging clients in an empathic manner and the ability to use a researchinformed practice. Thus, MI training meets both required competencies for accredited social work programs (Council on Social Work Education, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This is in response to MI's growing evidence, use, and demand among employers, funders, and some state regulators (Miller, Forcehimes, & Zweben, 2011). MI fits well with social work values (Hohman, 2012;Manthey, Knowles, et al, 2011), and training in MI provides students with concrete tools for engaging clients in an empathic manner and the ability to use a researchinformed practice. Thus, MI training meets both required competencies for accredited social work programs (Council on Social Work Education, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is underpinned by a philosophy, based upon self-efficacy, collaboration and a belief that the client's ideas about change are more meaningful and more valid than those of the therapist. This philosophy shares many similarities with participatory and strength-based approaches in social work (Manthey et al, 2011) and stands in stark contrast to what might be called a more 'typical'…”
Section: Motivational Social Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Framing/treating difficulties from a strengths perspective can assist individuals tap into the power of positive thinking which we know from research is positively associated with wellbeing. Furthermore, a strengths perspective aims to improve self-efficacy, empowering inividuals to see themselves as able to control, manage, and direct their personal health goals (see Grant & Cadell, 2009;Manthey, Knowles, Asher, & Wahab, 2011).…”
Section: Mental Wellbeingmentioning
confidence: 99%