2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52280-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengths and Pitfalls of Whole-Heart Atlas-Based Segmentation in Congenital Heart Disease Patients

Abstract: Abstract. Atlas-based whole-heart segmentation is a well-established technique for the extraction of key cardiac structures of the adult heart. Despite its relative success in this domain, its implementation in wholeheart segmentation of paediatric patients suffering from a form of congenital heart disease is not straightforward. The aim of this work is to evaluate the current strengths and limitations of whole-heart atlas based segmentation techniques within the context of the Whole-Heart and Great Vessel Seg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An atlas-based segmentation approach with a two-stage registration pipeline, where the majority voting and STEPS algorithms were used for the merging of the labels [23] 2017 HVSMR-2016 0.900 0.182 − A method having three crucial actions: heart identification from landmark detection, heart isolation using mathematical shape model, and segmentation using learning-based voxel classification and local phase analysis [24] 2018 [26], where the student model acquired precisely the knowledge of unlabeled target data from intra-domain teachers by fostering prediction texture and the shape priors embedded in labeled source data from inter-domain teachers via information distillation. The authors also examined the utility of concurrently leveraging unlabeled data and well-known cross-modality data for the segmentation.…”
Section: Metrics Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An atlas-based segmentation approach with a two-stage registration pipeline, where the majority voting and STEPS algorithms were used for the merging of the labels [23] 2017 HVSMR-2016 0.900 0.182 − A method having three crucial actions: heart identification from landmark detection, heart isolation using mathematical shape model, and segmentation using learning-based voxel classification and local phase analysis [24] 2018 [26], where the student model acquired precisely the knowledge of unlabeled target data from intra-domain teachers by fostering prediction texture and the shape priors embedded in labeled source data from inter-domain teachers via information distillation. The authors also examined the utility of concurrently leveraging unlabeled data and well-known cross-modality data for the segmentation.…”
Section: Metrics Different Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Segmentation of the congenitally malformed heart from CMR images is a challenging task due to inhomogeneity in signal intensity, limited contrast-tonoise ratio and the presence of image artefacts [5]. Furthermore, significant variation in the structural presentation of disease limits the success of conventional methods such as atlas-based strategies [9]. Finally, patient-specific 3D printing demands a high fidelity representation of disease, demonstrating anatomy at the limit of spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%