2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration

Abstract: In observational epidemiology, mendelian randomisation (MR) studies provide an opportunity to study the causal association between an exposure and an outcome while reducing the risk of certain biases Little consensus exists around the reporting of MR studies, and the quality of reporting of these studies has been inconsistent; many MR study reports do not state or examine the various assumptions of MR and report insufficient details on the data sources STROBE-MR (strengthening the reporting of observational st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
478
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
(308 reference statements)
5
478
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, there was no overlap between the datasets contributing toward the gene-exposure association and gene-outcome associations, which could otherwise introduce sampling bias [ 11 ]. We reported our findings in line with the MR-STROBE guidance [ 12 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In our study, there was no overlap between the datasets contributing toward the gene-exposure association and gene-outcome associations, which could otherwise introduce sampling bias [ 11 ]. We reported our findings in line with the MR-STROBE guidance [ 12 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The study was conducted using publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data. The study was reported based on recommendations by STROBE-MR and "Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations" (Burgess et al, 2020;Skrivankova et al, 2021). The study protocol and details were not pre-registered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was reported following the recommendations of the STROBE-MR guidelines (27) ( Supplementary material ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%