Strengthening patient safety in transitions of care: an emerging role for local medical centres in Norway

Abstract

BackgroundPatient safety has gained less attention in primary care in comparison to specialised care. We explore how local medical centres (LMCs) can play a role in strengthening patient safety, both locally and in transitions between care levels. LMCs represent a form of intermediate care organisation in Norway that is increasingly used as a strategy for integrated care policies. The analysis is based on institutional theory and general safety theories.MethodsA qualitative design was applied, involving 20 interviews of nursing home managers, managers at local medical centres and administrative personnel.ResultsThe LMCs mediate important information between care levels, partly by means of workarounds, but also as a result of having access to the different information and communications technology (ICT) systems in use. Their knowledge of local conditions is found to be a key asset. LMCs are providers of competence and training for the local level, as well as serving as quality assurers.ConclusionsAs a growing organisational form in Norway, LMCs have to legitimise their role in the health care system. They represent an asset to the local level in terms of information, competence and quality assurance. As they have overlapping competencies, tasks and responsibilities with other parts of the health care system, they add to organisational redundancy and strengthen patient safety.

Kartlegging av kompetanse er nødvendig for å sikre gode helsetjenester

“…Studier viste ikke noen økt risiko for pasienter ved å motta desentralisert medisinsk behandling (8-10). Fragmentering av omsorg, et økt antall grensesnitt og pasientoverføringer kan likevel anses som en trussel mot pasientsikkerheten (11). Svakheter ved kommunikasjon og informasjonsoverføring ved utskrivelse fra sykehuset er vanlig og kan påvirke pasientomsorgen negativt (12).…”

Upside Down Hospital: Co-Producing Safety With Patients

“…A review of the Cochrane library identified 19 publicationsnone of the studies used the term redundancy in line with the inclusion criteria. Several publications (Kongsvik, Halvorsen, Osmundsen, & Gjøsund, 2016;Penchansky & Macnee, 1993;Trevino et al, 2018;Van Spall, Kassam, & Tollefson, 2015;Watkins, Tirabassi, & Aversano, 2006) reference generic principles of redundancy in safer systems as codified and adapted from Sutcliffe (Sutcliffe, 2011). The remaining manuscripts listed examples of redundancy to structures and processes of healthcare (Donabedian, 1988).…”

Advancing the status of nursing: reconstructing professional nursing identity through patient safety work

“…This is partly related to more structured efforts to measure patient harm, which have revealed the magnitude of the problem. The insights from the report ‘To err is human’, and similar reports from other countries, instigated a variety of programmes, on both the global and national levels [9]. Review studies show that the median incidence rate of in-hospital adverse events ranges from 9 to 10%, with considerable variations between the reviewed studies [10, 11].…”