2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2001)5:2(76)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Using FRPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
38
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…FRP are helpful in reducing the impact of the above techniques [33,34]. FRP are used for external surface reinforcements [35] or to create internal frames inside the masonry system [36].…”
Section: Structural and Seismic Retrofittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRP are helpful in reducing the impact of the above techniques [33,34]. FRP are used for external surface reinforcements [35] or to create internal frames inside the masonry system [36].…”
Section: Structural and Seismic Retrofittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study determines that CFRP stripe materials prove to be a good alternative for strengthening the structural brick walls against the lateral loads in that energy dissipation capacities are improved. Albert et al [2] conducted experimental works to determine the behaviour of the structural brick walls strengthened using carbon and glass FRPs under cyclic axial compressive loading, with various FRP forms, quantities and number of layers. Also providing the analyses on out-of-plane lateral loading, the study establishes that the performance of pre-damaged and non-damaged brick wall specimens strengthened using carbon fi bre stripes are much better than those strengthened using glass fi bres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural vulnerability and damage-failure patterns of unreinforced masonry (URM) were studied by many researchers (Korkmaz, 2010;Bruneau, 1994;Tornabvie, 1997;Benedetti et al, 1998;Abrams, 2001;Paquette and Bruneau, 2003;Doherty et al, 2002). Of the methods considered, injection grouting, insertation of reinforcing steel, prestressing, jacketing, use of FRP and various surface treatments were the most common (Albert et al, 2001). The difficulties in performing advanced testing of this type of structures are quite large due to the innumerable variations of masonry, the large scatter of in situ material properties and the impossibility of reproducing it all in a specimen (Zucchini and Lourenco, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%