2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening in a WE54 magnesium alloy containing SiC particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, T s determines the limit of applicability of a material at high temperatures Highest microhardness is the consequence of the role of nano-particles and fine grained structure which also maintain high thermal stability of Cu-2.5Al composite. It may be assumed that nano-sized Al 2 O 3 particles some of which are distributed at the grain boundaries and dislocations will slow down the grain growth in Cu-2.5Al composite [14]. Recrystallization is moved to temperatures even above 800 o C. The lower microhardness (nearly two times) compared to Cu-2.5Al is the direct consequence of increase of grain size in Cu-5Al 2 O 3 composite suggesting that the role of micro-sized commercial Al 2 O 3 particles in obstructing grain growth is less efficient.…”
Section: Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, T s determines the limit of applicability of a material at high temperatures Highest microhardness is the consequence of the role of nano-particles and fine grained structure which also maintain high thermal stability of Cu-2.5Al composite. It may be assumed that nano-sized Al 2 O 3 particles some of which are distributed at the grain boundaries and dislocations will slow down the grain growth in Cu-2.5Al composite [14]. Recrystallization is moved to temperatures even above 800 o C. The lower microhardness (nearly two times) compared to Cu-2.5Al is the direct consequence of increase of grain size in Cu-5Al 2 O 3 composite suggesting that the role of micro-sized commercial Al 2 O 3 particles in obstructing grain growth is less efficient.…”
Section: Thermal Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the compressive stress detected at any given strain was lower for AZ91/ZK60A/ 1.5 vol% AlN compared to monolithic AZ91/ZK60A as shown in Figure 4(b). The tensile strength increase in AZ91/ ZK60A/1.5 vol% AlN compared to monolithic AZ91/ ZK60A can be attributed to the following well-known factors (pertaining to reinforcement): (a) dislocation generation due to elastic modulus mismatch and coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch between the matrix and reinforcement [28][29][30][31], (b) Orowan strengthening mechanism [30][31][32], and (c) load transfer from matrix to reinforcement [28,30]. The lower compressive strength of AZ91/ZK60A/1.5 vol% AlN compared to monolithic AZ91/ZK60A can be attributed possibly to compressive shear buckling of brittle Mg-Zn nanorods in AZ91/ZK60A/1.5 vol% AlN as illustrated in Figure 5.…”
Section: Tensile and Compressivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case of reduction in size of Mg-Al second phase, redistribution of smaller second phase (compare between predominantly aggregated type and dispersed type) assists in improving ductility [18]. Any hypothetical strength increase in the nanocomposite (effect 1) can be attributed to the following well known factors (pertaining to reinforcement): (a) dislocation generation due to elastic modulus mismatch and coefficient of thermal expansion mismatch between the matrix and reinforcement [19][20][21][22], (b) Orowan strengthening mechanism [21][22][23], and (c) load transfer from matrix to reinforcement [19,21]. However, any hypothetical strength decrease in the nanocomposite (effect 2) can be attributed to reduction in size of Mg-Al second phase (since there is no statistical change in grain size between AZ81 and AZ81/Si 3 N 4 ).…”
Section: Tensile/compressivementioning
confidence: 99%