2017
DOI: 10.7196/samj.2017.v107i11.12903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening implant provision and acceptance in South Africa with the ‘Any woman, any place, any time’ approach: An essential step towards reducing unintended pregnancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(108 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Only 20% of private facilities in Kenya supply LARCs, whereas more than 65% supply other methods 20 -an observation reflected in the present data. 34 Only 20% of private facilities in Kenya supply LARCs, whereas more than 65% supply other methods 20 -an observation reflected in the present data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Only 20% of private facilities in Kenya supply LARCs, whereas more than 65% supply other methods 20 -an observation reflected in the present data. 34 Only 20% of private facilities in Kenya supply LARCs, whereas more than 65% supply other methods 20 -an observation reflected in the present data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…as FSWs, and counseling should be reoriented to emphasize LARCs as a "first-line" contraceptive method. 34 Only 20% of private facilities in Kenya supply LARCs, whereas more than 65% supply other methods 20 -an observation reflected in the present data. Sex worker drop-incenters supplied very few contraceptives (other than male condoms).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…High rates of contraceptive discontinuation of short-term methods by users in sub-Sahara Africa have, however, prompted expansion of access to longer-acting methods, most recently implants as observed in this study. 19 The continuation rates of implants as reported by Oladipo et al was higher among those who had adequate pre-insertion counseling and encouraging return for side -effects, follow-up phone calls and home visit would also, raise contraceptive rates. 11,12,20 Failure rates are described by the Pearl Index, which refers to the number of failures per 100 women using the contraceptive method for a year (100 women years), 21 however, subdermal implants contraceptive failure was not recorded during the period of review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Injections are the most commonly used and often the only available non‐barrier method in this population but are reported to have acceptability concerns among FSWs due to side effects which interfere with their ability to work . Additional barriers to access and uptake of contraception among FSWs include stigma or refusal of service due to sex work, young age or marital status, limited availability or choice of contraceptive methods, lack of health workers trained in LARC provision and limited knowledge of contraceptive methods .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%