2015
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000000882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening healthcare providers’ skills to improve HIV services for MSM in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facilitated conversations were at the center of the activities. Harro’s conceptual framework, ‘the cycle of socialization’, is closely compatible with our prior cross-cultural work with African health care providers on GBMSM stigma (van der Elst, Gichuru et al, 2013 ; van der Elst, Gichuru et al, 2015 ; van der Elst, Kombo et al, 2015 ; van der Elst, Smith et al, 2013 ), and the literature on GBMSM stigma (Dijkstra et al, 2015 ). The model built on a set of concepts, deriving from the introductory guide for health care providers working with GBMSM in Africa (Brown, Duby, Scheibe, & Sanders, 2011 ), and emphasized the overarching context of stigma and discrimination, linked to religious leaders’ attitudes, offering possible courses of action to ‘choose the direction to change’, interrupt the cycle of socialization and potentially dismantle GBMSM oppression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Facilitated conversations were at the center of the activities. Harro’s conceptual framework, ‘the cycle of socialization’, is closely compatible with our prior cross-cultural work with African health care providers on GBMSM stigma (van der Elst, Gichuru et al, 2013 ; van der Elst, Gichuru et al, 2015 ; van der Elst, Kombo et al, 2015 ; van der Elst, Smith et al, 2013 ), and the literature on GBMSM stigma (Dijkstra et al, 2015 ). The model built on a set of concepts, deriving from the introductory guide for health care providers working with GBMSM in Africa (Brown, Duby, Scheibe, & Sanders, 2011 ), and emphasized the overarching context of stigma and discrimination, linked to religious leaders’ attitudes, offering possible courses of action to ‘choose the direction to change’, interrupt the cycle of socialization and potentially dismantle GBMSM oppression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Key structural factors included perceived staff attitudes, a lack of quality assurance, a lack of data protection and confidentiality, and cost [31,32,37,40,50,52]. Apart from addressing stigma and general competency to provide MSM with PrEP among healthcare providers in LMICwhich have been noted by others [83,84] our results suggest that strengthening health systems so as to assure universal provision of high-quality PrEP, while protecting the identities of MSM, will be critical. Strengthening drug regulation in middle-income countries has also been highlighted as essential by other authors [85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…If the Kenyan MoH PrEP guidelines can be updated to include RAI as an indicator for PrEP eligibility, this would help normalize discussions on anal sex and ensure that all individuals at high risk for HIV-1 acquisition are offered PrEP. In addition, sensitization training of health care providers should be facilitated to reduce homophobic attitudes [20] and improve MSM healthcare services [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, we developed an empiric risk score to guide PrEP targeting among at-risk MSM who were followed in a vaccine feasibility study and had an HIV-1 incidence of 7.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8-8.6) per 100 person-years. Characteristics of the cohort-derived HIV-1 risk score (CDHRS) included having only male sex partners, RAI, any recent unprotected sex, group sex, and young age (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) years) [7]. Although the CDHRS tool had a good performance in detecting HIV-1 acquisition among MSM eligible for PrEP in this cohort, we were interested to compare it to the performance of the MoH PrEP risk criteria to identify at-risk MSM for PrEP uptake in this cohort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%