2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening coastal adaptation planning through scenario analysis: A beneficial but incomplete solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used a five-step methodology from previously published scenario analyses by Blyth [24] and Gray [27].…”
Section: Applying the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used a five-step methodology from previously published scenario analyses by Blyth [24] and Gray [27].…”
Section: Applying the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed scenarios were developed based on these four quadrants, which have varying levels of donor dependence and quality of investment and market. Following the method of Blyth [24] and Gray [27], four descriptive scenarios were developed, each reflecting a different combination of donor dependence and investment environment (see Figure 3). The scenario methodology forces a focus on particular significant but uncertain barriers, for which developing strategies and flexible planning would be an imperative, and also helps to remove the bias of experts through its sequential treatment of pooled interview data.…”
Section: Step 5: Developing the Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic evaluation of the strategies presented in this paper highlights different styles of implementation across the sites and the significance of institutional maturity and the length of period of collaborative working in determining progress in adaptation planning. Gray et al [19] explore the strengths of scenario analysis further. Whilst demonstrating the potential of scenarios to overcome some of the key barriers within the adaptation process [19], this paper highlights some of the key issues associated with the longer-term horizons associated with these approaches, as weak longterm institutional drivers compete against the immediate priorities and significant other pressures of managers and planners.…”
Section: Contributions To This Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gray et al [19] explore the strengths of scenario analysis further. Whilst demonstrating the potential of scenarios to overcome some of the key barriers within the adaptation process [19], this paper highlights some of the key issues associated with the longer-term horizons associated with these approaches, as weak longterm institutional drivers compete against the immediate priorities and significant other pressures of managers and planners.…”
Section: Contributions To This Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is considerable weight of theory to support more sustainable approaches to natural resource management, global assessments of practical progress to more sustainable development are depressingly consistent (e.g., IPBES 2019) and international policies for food production, which dominate the modern globe and generally fail to incorporate consideration of the multiple ecosystem services provided by nature, resulting in the gradual erosion of environmental quality (O'Higgins 2017; Rouillard et al 2018). Based on our experiences of working with adaptation to climate change (Gray et al 2013(Gray et al , 2016DCCAE 2018aDCCAE , 2018b and application of ecosystem service concepts (O'Higgins et al 2010;Jordan et al 2012;O'Higgins and Gilbert 2014), the motivation behind this paper is to illustrate the simplicity and broad applicability of ecosystem service and adaptive management concepts (each component of ecosystem-based management) and to provide an integrated practical framework for future application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%