2011
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening clinical cancer research in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Background:In 1999, 270 000 cases of cancer were registered in the United Kingdom, placing a large burden on the NHS. Cancer outcome data in 1999 suggested that UK survival rates were poorer than most other European countries. In the same year, a Department of Health review noted that clinical trials accrual was poor (<3.5% of incident cases) and hypothesised that increasing research activity might improve outcomes and reduce the variability of outcomes across England. Thus, the National Cancer Research Networ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rising number of cancer clinical trials, the more stringent national and international legislation and Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, combined with the increasing demand for pharmacy support, prompted the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN; currently known as National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN)) to form a standardisation committee in 2003, which evolved into the current Chemotherapy and Pharmacy Advisory Service (CPAS) by the end of 2007. 7,8 It was set up to advise chief investigators, clinical trials units and clinical studies groups on the chemotherapy-and pharmacy-related content of their protocols, in order to maintain and enhance research quality and thereby aid development of high-quality research protocols. The aim was first to involve pharmacists, clinicians, nurses and pharmacy technicians at the early stages of protocol design to address problems with the protocol and underpin the ability of hospital pharmacies to support clinical trials of new and established drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rising number of cancer clinical trials, the more stringent national and international legislation and Good Manufacturing Practice requirements, combined with the increasing demand for pharmacy support, prompted the National Cancer Research Network (NCRN; currently known as National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN)) to form a standardisation committee in 2003, which evolved into the current Chemotherapy and Pharmacy Advisory Service (CPAS) by the end of 2007. 7,8 It was set up to advise chief investigators, clinical trials units and clinical studies groups on the chemotherapy-and pharmacy-related content of their protocols, in order to maintain and enhance research quality and thereby aid development of high-quality research protocols. The aim was first to involve pharmacists, clinicians, nurses and pharmacy technicians at the early stages of protocol design to address problems with the protocol and underpin the ability of hospital pharmacies to support clinical trials of new and established drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timely accrual to randomised controlled trials and observational studies within the cancer trials portfolio has increased significantly since the NIHR Cancer Research Network was established, rising from <5% of incidence cases in 2001 to >20% in 2010 3. Although the majority of trials within the portfolio are clinical trials of an investigational medicinal product there is interest in developing other types of interventional studies 4. The success of the NIHR Cancer Research Network model for supporting clinical trials in England led to the establishment of a generic Clinical Research Network to provide infrastructure for other clinical groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post NCRN, these medians were both on target and 74% of trials recruited to target compared with 30% before the NCRN. 12 A large number of practice-changing randomised trials have been supported through this route (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delivery of study targets for recruitment in a timely way is an important part of the work of the NCRN and this was studied by Stead et al (Fig 3). 12 Before the establishment of the NCRN, the median recruitment periods exceeded the planned periods and median recruitment numbers were less than targets. Post NCRN, these medians were both on target and 74% of trials recruited to target compared with 30% before the NCRN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation