2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2008.00474.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strengthening acceptance for xenotransplantation: the case of attraction effect

Abstract: These results demonstrate that paradigms from other fields, like decision-making, might help to communicate more effectively the potential of xenotransplantation, modulating patients' affective reactions and allowing them to understand the potential strengths of this biomedical technology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, studies have also shown that the acceptance rate of xenotransplantation is rather influenced by their affective reaction and not only by the level of information. It was possible to significantly increase the acceptance of xenotransplantation by using the attraction effect: organs from pigs are chosen more frequently if the set of alternatives is enlarged by adding a new option, which is equally available but more aversive than pig organs (15). Analytical information, such as data on the availability of donor organs seemed to play a minor role in decision making (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, studies have also shown that the acceptance rate of xenotransplantation is rather influenced by their affective reaction and not only by the level of information. It was possible to significantly increase the acceptance of xenotransplantation by using the attraction effect: organs from pigs are chosen more frequently if the set of alternatives is enlarged by adding a new option, which is equally available but more aversive than pig organs (15). Analytical information, such as data on the availability of donor organs seemed to play a minor role in decision making (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary review of the 19 studies being considered, presented with considerable independent variable heterogeneity, and exhibited significant variability in the questions asked . However, the majority reported that, among those surveyed, >50% supported XTx, with a range from as low of 37% to a maximum of 83% . Of the 19 data‐based studies, 12 were considered for inclusion in our study, but only eight provided original data in a usable format for meta‐analysis .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study by our group recently showed that patients have a rather negative affective reaction toward xenotransplantation and they are not willing to undergo such a procedure when the chance of getting a human organ is also available [14]. In the same study, we showed that decisionmaking paradigms might help improving patients attitude toward xenotransplantation as well as explaining the factors involved in people's perception of this type of biomedical technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We already knew that patients prefer to receive a new organ from a donor of their same species [14]. However, the full appreciation of the strength of xenotransplantation by the patients is heavily depending on both affective reactions and analytical information (e.g., organs availability).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%