2023
DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2162627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength versus aerobic program: effects on body composition and health-related physical fitness levels of youths with Down syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, prior researchers have demonstrated the effects of several different physical training methods (e.g., combined physical training, game-based exercise, and mini-basketball) for improving physical fitness in children with ASD (Cai et al, 2020; Haghighi et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2018). Notably, strength training is an evolving approach with accumulating supportive evidence for both typically developing children (Jaimes et al, 2022) and children with disabilities (Kachouri et al, 2016; Merino-Andrés et al, 2022; Suarez-Villadat et al, 2022). More specifically, strength training has been found to improve some measures of physical fitness among adolescents with ASD (Lochbaum & Crews, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, prior researchers have demonstrated the effects of several different physical training methods (e.g., combined physical training, game-based exercise, and mini-basketball) for improving physical fitness in children with ASD (Cai et al, 2020; Haghighi et al, 2022; Yu et al, 2018). Notably, strength training is an evolving approach with accumulating supportive evidence for both typically developing children (Jaimes et al, 2022) and children with disabilities (Kachouri et al, 2016; Merino-Andrés et al, 2022; Suarez-Villadat et al, 2022). More specifically, strength training has been found to improve some measures of physical fitness among adolescents with ASD (Lochbaum & Crews, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%