2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-017-1180-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength of the Solar Coronal Magnetic Field – A Comparison of Independent Estimates Using Contemporaneous Radio and White-Light Observations

Abstract: We estimated the coronal magnetic field strength (B) during the 23 July 2016 coronal mass ejection (CME) event using i) the flux rope structure of the CME in the whitelight coronagraph images and ii) the band splitting in the associated type II burst. No models were assumed for the coronal electron density (N (r)) used in the estimation. The results obtained using the above two independent methods correspond to different heliocentric distances (r) in the range ≈ 2.5 -4.5R ⊙ , but they show excellent consistenc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each file size is ≈ 700 kB. The file sizes are expected to be much higher for digital back end instrumentation based on FPGAs and fast ADCs (see for example Kumari et al (2017); Mugundhan et al (2018)). Hence the necessity of a sophisticated algorithm to classify solar radio radio bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each file size is ≈ 700 kB. The file sizes are expected to be much higher for digital back end instrumentation based on FPGAs and fast ADCs (see for example Kumari et al (2017); Mugundhan et al (2018)). Hence the necessity of a sophisticated algorithm to classify solar radio radio bursts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cho et al (2007) used MK4 coronameter data to constrain the electron density and deduced magnetic field of 1.3-0.4 G at heights of 1.6-2.1 R ⊙ . Similarly, Kumari et al (2017) and Kumari et al (2019) derived the electron density from white light space born coronograph images and reported 0.47-0.44 G at heliocentric 2.61-2.74 R ⊙ and 1.21-0.5 G at heliocentric 1.58-2.15 R ⊙ , respectively. Gopalswamy et al (2012), using additional information on the geometry of the shock from SDO/AIA images, determined the coronal magnetic field to be in the range of 1.3-1.5 G at heliocentric 1.2-1.5 R ⊙ .…”
Section: Type II Burstsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to understand the shock-driving capability of CMEs, we need to investigate early CME kinematics near the Sun. CMEs leave imprints in different wavelengths, so it is necessary to stitch multiwavelength information for a better understanding of CME behavior (Pick et al, 2006;Vršnak et al, 2006;Zucca et al, 2014;Kumari et al, 2017c;Morosan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%