2011
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-011-9738-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength of lime–fly ash compacts using different curing techniques and gypsum additive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large no. of bodies has been worked on the effective utilization of FA [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Initiative From Govt Of India For Ash Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large no. of bodies has been worked on the effective utilization of FA [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Initiative From Govt Of India For Ash Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, an excess of either component diminishes the effectiveness in boosting compressive strength. For optimal results, the proportion of these materials can be finely tuned 25 27 . Lin et al 28 established that a 1:2 ratio of quicklime to fly ash yields the most effective consolidation of soft soil.…”
Section: Test Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the compressive strength of the blocks having fly ash increased by two-to three-fold compared to those without fly ash. The production and properties of compacted fly ash bricks and their masonry have been studied 12,13 . These studies recommended an optimum ratio of 35% fly ash and 65% sand for better strength and durability characteristics.…”
Section: Non-organic Solid Wastementioning
confidence: 99%