2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength matters: Tie strength as a causal driver of networks’ information benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stages of relationships determine the benefits they convey (Porter & Woo, 2015). As individuals move from early initiation stages to later stages of relationships, networking partners may share more information (Kim & Fernandez, 2017). Our measures did not assess dimensions of network contacts, such as length and closeness of the relationship, and whether they were primary or secondary contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stages of relationships determine the benefits they convey (Porter & Woo, 2015). As individuals move from early initiation stages to later stages of relationships, networking partners may share more information (Kim & Fernandez, 2017). Our measures did not assess dimensions of network contacts, such as length and closeness of the relationship, and whether they were primary or secondary contacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networkers can receive more than one of these proximal networking benefits from the same person (Cross & Sproull, 2004; Levin, Walter, & Murnighan, 2011). Strong ties (i.e., close friends, family members, or relatives) tend to facilitate more personal disclosure, problem reformulation, and transmission of useful information (Cross & Sproull, 2004; Kim & Fernandez, 2017; Lin, 2008). Weak ties (more socially distant ties such as acquaintances or friends of friends) provide more solutions, because distal networks provide information that is less redundant with closer circles (Cross & Sproull, 2004; Lin, 2008).…”
Section: Job Search Networkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erickson, 2001;Lin, 1999), whereas others stress the importance of close contacts and strong ties (e.g. Kim and Fernandez, 2017;Obukhova, 2012).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While weak ties may be the most important for successful social network recruitment, they can also be very difficult to motivate [13][14]. Furthermore, social network search often requires exploring several different paths of social links, and motivating weak ties may become increasingly difficult with increasing social distance [15].…”
Section: Motivating Weak Ties With Recursive Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%