2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00721.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength Duration Curve for Epicardial Left Ventricular Stimulation

Abstract: The left ventricular unipolar or bipolar epicardial chronaxie is not significantly different from the right ventricular endocardial chronaxie. Both values are lower than the pulse duration used as default setting in most devices as well as in clinical practice. Individual determination of the chronaxie could lead to energy savings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean stimulation chronaxie of 0.15 ms for the lead tip and 0.23 ms for the coil are situated at the lower edge of the 0.2 ms to 0.6 ms chronaxie range reported for electrodes with a surface area from 2 mm 2 to 10 mm 2 30 , 32–36 . In historical data, amplitude resolution was limited, with the finest voltage step being 20% to 40% of rheobase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean stimulation chronaxie of 0.15 ms for the lead tip and 0.23 ms for the coil are situated at the lower edge of the 0.2 ms to 0.6 ms chronaxie range reported for electrodes with a surface area from 2 mm 2 to 10 mm 2 30 , 32–36 . In historical data, amplitude resolution was limited, with the finest voltage step being 20% to 40% of rheobase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The mean stimulation chronaxie of 0.15 ms for the lead tip and 0.23 ms for the coil are situated at the lower edge of the 0.2 ms to 0.6 ms chronaxie range reported for electrodes with a surface area from 2 mm 2 to 10 mm 2 . 30,[32][33][34][35][36] In historical data, amplitude resolution was limited, with the finest voltage step being 20% to 40% of rheobase. Strength-duration curves were usually reconstructed from 3 to 5 not-quite-exact data points, which introduced imprecision into the chronaxie extrapolation and spurred recent recommendations on how to improve the methodology.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Results With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,12 However, none of these studies have compared the difference of strength-duration curves between the 6 commercially available LV configurations, nor have reported these strength-duration curves in terms of delivered energy. We found the Tip3 RV coil configuration to have the lowest voltage and energy strength-duration curve, whereas the Ring3 Can configuration had the highest energy strengthduration curve ( Figure, A and B).…”
Section: Prior Studies Comparing LV Pacing Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 However, most published studies of clinical data of strength-duration curve have been performed using peak voltage. 3,6,8,12,17 (3) Strength-duration curves were constructed using the Lapicque formula (rheobase voltage and chronaxie). LV thresholds were obtained at 0.4 ms and 1.5 ms (rheobase), and chronaxie pulse width was obtained using twice the rheobase voltage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strength-duration curves were theoretically studied for optimizing ventricular defibrillation thresholds for both square-wave stimulation pulses and exponential discharge pulses and were shown to be ideally hyperbolic (Irnich 2008;Koning et al 1975). Experimental studies of strength-duration relationships were conducted, e.g., in the left ventricular epicardium of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (Dhar et al 2009;Scally et al 2007), in the right ventricular apex for transvenous defibrillation in humans and in animal models, as well as in the atria and ventricles of patients with acutely implanted pacing leads (Coates and Thwaites 2000;Gold and Shorofsky 1997;Lawo et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%