2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength assessment after proximal hamstring rupture: A critical review and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, these isometric protocols only assessed the knee extensors and never the knee flexors. Isometric testing is usually not adjustable for gravity, which can bias results 19 . On the contrary, isokinetic testing is widely considered as a method of reference in the evaluation of muscular knee strength, 20,21 including patients with haemophilia 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these isometric protocols only assessed the knee extensors and never the knee flexors. Isometric testing is usually not adjustable for gravity, which can bias results 19 . On the contrary, isokinetic testing is widely considered as a method of reference in the evaluation of muscular knee strength, 20,21 including patients with haemophilia 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed a subjectively estimated residual strength of more or equal to 75% [ 19 , 44 ], which must be considered unsatisfactory. In other words, the patients may subjectively estimate a muscle strength deficit of up to 25%, even though the previously reported objectively measured strength deficit may be only around 15% at 12 months after surgery [ 13 , 26 , 49 ]. This discrepancy emphasizes the need for an objective, quantitative, and, most importantly, comparable assessment of postoperative hamstring muscle strength between studies, as recommended by Reza et al [ 50 ] and Fouasson-Chailloux et al [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the patients may subjectively estimate a muscle strength deficit of up to 25%, even though the previously reported objectively measured strength deficit may be only around 15% at 12 months after surgery [ 13 , 26 , 49 ]. This discrepancy emphasizes the need for an objective, quantitative, and, most importantly, comparable assessment of postoperative hamstring muscle strength between studies, as recommended by Reza et al [ 50 ] and Fouasson-Chailloux et al [ 49 ]. The overall deficit of peak flexor strength in the affected leg achieved in our patients (3.5%) is well below the 15% reported in the review by Fouasson-Chailloux et al [ 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 4 months post-surgery, the H-LSI is related to the recovery of hamstring strength [ 39 ]. This recovery can sometimes be late due to posterior knee pain or arthrofibrosis and is rarely complete at 12 months post-surgery (H-LSI: 83 to 95%) due to the regeneration of the hamstring tendons [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%