2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and serviceability performance of beams reinforced with GFRP bars in flexure

Abstract: Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars have been identified as an alternate construction material for reinforcing concrete during the last decade primarily due to its strength and durability related characteristics. These materials have strength higher than steel, but exhibit linear stress-strain response up to failure. Furthermore, the modulus of elasticity of GFRP is significantly lower than that of steel. This reduced stiffness often controls the design of the GFRP reinforced concrete elements. In the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, results from tests on 145 RC beams (Abdalla 2002, Alsayed 1998, Al-Sunna et al 2006, Barris et al 2009, Bogdanovic 2002, Benmokrane et al 1996, Cosenza et al 1997, Duranovic et al 1997, Larralde & Rodríguez 1992, Pecce et al 1998, Saikia et al 2007, Toutanji & Deng 2003, Yost et al 2003) are compared with 10 existing approaches of deflection prediction. The objective of the study was to investigate the sensitivity and the goodness of fit of the different models to the mentioned database.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, results from tests on 145 RC beams (Abdalla 2002, Alsayed 1998, Al-Sunna et al 2006, Barris et al 2009, Bogdanovic 2002, Benmokrane et al 1996, Cosenza et al 1997, Duranovic et al 1997, Larralde & Rodríguez 1992, Pecce et al 1998, Saikia et al 2007, Toutanji & Deng 2003, Yost et al 2003) are compared with 10 existing approaches of deflection prediction. The objective of the study was to investigate the sensitivity and the goodness of fit of the different models to the mentioned database.…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher deformability of concrete structures reinforced with GFRP bars is also caused by the smaller bond stiffness of these bars, when compared to the actual generation of steel bars used for the reinforcement of concrete structures [7][8][9]. This aspect promotes the occurrence of smaller number of cracks (larger crack spacing) of larger crack width at serviceability limit state (SLS) conditions, when steel reinforcement is considered for comparison purposes [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequate account of the serviceability behavior and the parameters involved in the post-cracking behavior is of major importance for the design of RC structures (Bischoff 2007;Baena et al 2011;Gribniak et al 2010;Kaklauskas et al 2012). Due to the mechanical properties of FRP materials, the Serviceability Limit States (SLS) may govern the design of FRP RC elements (ISIS Canada 2001;Matthys, Taerwe 2000;Nanni 2003;Saikia et al 2007;Rafi, Nadjai 2009). At a cross-section level, two requirements limit the SLS: stresses in materials and cracking (Eurocode 2 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%