2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and histology of a nanofiber scaffold in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have used P(LLA-CL) as a scaffold in tissue engineering, primarily due to its excellent mechanical properties and good biocompatibility (6,31). However, P(LLA-CL) polymers have certain disadvantages, including inertness, low bioactive properties and hydrophobicity, which result in limited cell-cell interactions (21,32,33). SF, a natural protein, has been widely used in tissue engineering due to its unique properties, including good biocompatibility, good water vapor permeability and low cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have used P(LLA-CL) as a scaffold in tissue engineering, primarily due to its excellent mechanical properties and good biocompatibility (6,31). However, P(LLA-CL) polymers have certain disadvantages, including inertness, low bioactive properties and hydrophobicity, which result in limited cell-cell interactions (21,32,33). SF, a natural protein, has been widely used in tissue engineering due to its unique properties, including good biocompatibility, good water vapor permeability and low cost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%