2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strength and function recovery after multiple-ligament reconstruction of the knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in both absolute wattage achieved and output proportional to the contralateral limb were highly significant ( p < 0.001), the implant group with the proposed mechanical advantage actually demonstrating superior power output compared to the contralateral limb. This is distinct from previous reports of the recovery of muscle power in the lower limb following knee arthroplasty and indeed other surgical procedures following knee injury, where the affected knee typically achieves 80–90% of the power of the contralateral limb. Interestingly, the patients in the other arm of the trial, who received an implant that did not have the theoretical mechanical advantage, achieved this figure of 90%, consistent with these previous reports.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Differences in both absolute wattage achieved and output proportional to the contralateral limb were highly significant ( p < 0.001), the implant group with the proposed mechanical advantage actually demonstrating superior power output compared to the contralateral limb. This is distinct from previous reports of the recovery of muscle power in the lower limb following knee arthroplasty and indeed other surgical procedures following knee injury, where the affected knee typically achieves 80–90% of the power of the contralateral limb. Interestingly, the patients in the other arm of the trial, who received an implant that did not have the theoretical mechanical advantage, achieved this figure of 90%, consistent with these previous reports.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Correlation with Tegner activity scores was 0.56 in one study, suggesting measurement of a separate activity-related construct 28. In other studies, postoperative IKDC scores corresponded with Lysholm, Cincinnati, KOOS, and Orthopädische Arbeitsgruppe Knie (OAK) scores 9–12 15 16 19 21 24 25 27–49. However, these studies did not detail individual patient scores, and thus, correlations with the IKDC could not be quantified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…KOOS scores did improve along with IKDC, Lysholm, Marx, Short Musculoskeletal Function Questionnaire (SMFA) and Tegner scores in several studies 10–12 15 16…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relatively little is known about the functional deficits in patients with the meniscus suture or its re-fixation and the possible relevance of postoperative, supervised rehabilitation [4]. Results of isokinetic muscle force examinations do not always correlate with the scores of functional assessment (one-leg rising test, one-leg-hope test) in patients treated surgically because of knee injuries [3, 28, 29]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%