Street Stops and Police Legitimacy: Teachable Moments in Young Urban Men’s Legal Socialization

Abstract

An examination of the influence of street stops on the legal socialization of young men showed an association between the number of police stops they see or experience and a diminished sense of police legitimacy. This association was not primarily a consequence of the number of stops or of the degree of police intrusion during those stops. Rather, the impact of involuntary contact with the police was mediated by evaluations of the fairness of police actions and judgments about whether the police were acting lawfully. Whether the police were viewed as exercising their authority fairly and lawfully shaped the impact of stops on respondent's general judgments about police legitimacy. Fairness and lawfulness judgments, in turn, were influenced by the number of stops and the degree of police intrusion during those stops.Similarly, judgments of justice and lawfulness shaped the estimated influence of judgments of the general character of police behavior in the community on general perceptions of police legitimacy. These results suggest that the widespread use of street stops undermined legitimacy.Lowered legitimacy had an influence on both law abidingness and the willingness to cooperate with legal authorities. The findings show that people were influenced by perceptions of police injustice/illegality.Words: 12,617 1

Perceived Police Injustice, Moral Disengagement, and Aggression Among Juvenile Offenders: Utilizing the General Strain Theory Model

“…For instance, a recent intervention sought to train police officers in adolescent developmental theory to limit the arrest of youth in general, and minority youth specifically (Goodrich, Anderson & LaMotte, 2014). Training officers to approach adolescents in developmentally appropriate ways may also improve adolescents' perceptions regarding the legitimacy of police officers (Tyler, Fagan & Geller, 2014). …”

A Sense of Injustice Loosens the Moral Bind of Law

“…Future research could benefit from exploring the connection between procedural injustice and other important attitudes, such as definitions favorable to breaking the law (Akers, 2011;Sutherland, 1947), moral beliefs (Wikström, 2006), or commitment to conventional lines of action (Hirschi, 1969), to name a few. For example, the experience of procedural justice could serve as a teachable moment within the legal socialization process by reinforcing individuals' attitudes favorable to legal compliance (A. R. Piquero, Fagan, et al, 2005;Reisig et al, 2011;Sampson & Bartusch, 1998;Tyler, 2011;Tyler, Fagan, & Geller, 2014).…”

Theories of police legitimacy – its sources and effects

“…Not only do fair police make people more satisfied with it and compliant with the rules of the society (laws) (Tyler, 2006a), 16 they lead them also to greater cooperation on the tasks of the state authorities (Blader & Tyler, 2009;Bradford, 2014;Tankebe, 2013). It seems that procedural fairness can function also as a buffer against negative impacts of other police actions such as involuntary contact with it (stop and search) (Huq, Jackson, & Trinkner, 2016) which can negatively influence one's trust in it and lower their perceived legitimacy (Skogan, 2006;Tyler, Fagan, & Geller, 2014).…”