2022
DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2022.2133725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Street-level collaborative governance for urban regeneration: How were conflicts resolved at grassroot level?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through collaborative urban governance, cities can benefit from inclusive decision-making, innovative solutions, and improved responsiveness to the needs and aspirations of the community. By leveraging the expertise and perspectives of multiple stakeholders, this approach enhances the overall effectiveness and sustainability of urban development, fostering more resilient, equitable, and liveable cities [19].…”
Section: Collaborative Urban Governance (Cug)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through collaborative urban governance, cities can benefit from inclusive decision-making, innovative solutions, and improved responsiveness to the needs and aspirations of the community. By leveraging the expertise and perspectives of multiple stakeholders, this approach enhances the overall effectiveness and sustainability of urban development, fostering more resilient, equitable, and liveable cities [19].…”
Section: Collaborative Urban Governance (Cug)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the negative side, scholars point out the constraining role of participation in aggravating conflicts through the inclusion of opponents [17]. In the context of urban renewal, some scholars highlight the vital role of collaborative workshops serving as practical solutions for reaching consensus in participatory planning [18,19]; some emphasize that street-level collaborative governance is more effective at dealing with conflicts than macro-level governance, owing to less of a power imbalance and a strong commitment to collaborative processes [20]; some investigate different types of collaborative behavior among stakeholders (e.g., the degree of cooperation among related governments, conflict resolution efficiency, the degree of public participation, and the normality of public participation) associated with participatory regeneration [19]; and some explain the participatory regeneration process through the collaborative governance theory [21]. However, these studies investigate either collaborative behaviors in the participation process or the influencing role of existing collaborative governance in shaping participatory regeneration, leaving investigations into the influencing role of participatory regeneration in shaping future collaborative governance understudied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%