2015
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpv230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Street art belongs to the freeholder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those conditions are (i) the originality requirement, and (ii) the fixation requirement (Stech, 2015). Though some have disputed the originality of certain styles of street art such as tags and throw-ups on the basis of aesthetic considerations, the originality requirement simply demands that a work must be an original (in the sense of not copied) creation of an author (Bonadio, 2017;Iljadica, 2016aIljadica, , 2016b. The fixation requirement tells us that copyright applies only to works in a tangible medium.…”
Section: Should Copyright and Moral Rights Protect Street Art?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those conditions are (i) the originality requirement, and (ii) the fixation requirement (Stech, 2015). Though some have disputed the originality of certain styles of street art such as tags and throw-ups on the basis of aesthetic considerations, the originality requirement simply demands that a work must be an original (in the sense of not copied) creation of an author (Bonadio, 2017;Iljadica, 2016aIljadica, , 2016b. The fixation requirement tells us that copyright applies only to works in a tangible medium.…”
Section: Should Copyright and Moral Rights Protect Street Art?mentioning
confidence: 99%