1989
DOI: 10.1029/jb094ib09p12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streaming potential properties of westerly granite with applications

Abstract: This paper reports on laboratory measurements of the streaming potential properties of common minerals and in particular of Westerly granite. Data are presented for these solids in contact with simple electrolytic solutions and in one case for temperature variation in the range 5°–70°C. For 1:1 electrolytes the ratio of the streaming potential coupling coefficient to fluid resistivity was approximately −4 mV/(atm Ωm) and for 2:1 electrolytes −2 mV/(atm Ωm). The effect of temperature was small (0.05 mV/°C tempe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
215
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
10
215
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If these cavities are closed, the mass transfer creates a compression in one cavity and a decompression in the other, thereby generating an electroosmotic pressure AP. As with streaming potential, the steady state electroosmotic pressure is linearly proportional to the applied voltage, and the proportionality constant is denoted [Amaefule et al, 1986], the onset of inertial (i.e., "turbulent") effects at high flow rates [Geertsma, 1974], or not having adequate time for the steady state fluid flow profile to become fully established in low-permeability samples [Morgan et al, 1989]. If the sample under test has a rigid structure and permeability that is not too low, linearity in Ks can persist with applied pressures as large as 100 kPa and perhaps higher [Ishido and Mizutani, 1981; Jouniaux and Pozzi, 1995].…”
Section: Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these cavities are closed, the mass transfer creates a compression in one cavity and a decompression in the other, thereby generating an electroosmotic pressure AP. As with streaming potential, the steady state electroosmotic pressure is linearly proportional to the applied voltage, and the proportionality constant is denoted [Amaefule et al, 1986], the onset of inertial (i.e., "turbulent") effects at high flow rates [Geertsma, 1974], or not having adequate time for the steady state fluid flow profile to become fully established in low-permeability samples [Morgan et al, 1989]. If the sample under test has a rigid structure and permeability that is not too low, linearity in Ks can persist with applied pressures as large as 100 kPa and perhaps higher [Ishido and Mizutani, 1981; Jouniaux and Pozzi, 1995].…”
Section: Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] The z potential for most water-saturated geological sediments, according to Ishido and Mizutani [1981] and Morgan et al [1989], ranges between À10 mV and À100 mV; we choose À50 mV as an intermediate value.…”
Section: Validation Of a Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced field is simply a sta1Now at Shell UK Exploration and Production, Aberdeen, Laboratory experiments have been performed to measure streaming potentials caused by a pressure gradient through a porous rock and to determine the zeta potential or enhanced conductivity through the electrical double layer along the grain surfaces [Morgan et al, 1989;Jouniaux and Pozzi, 1995]. Zhu et al [1999] investigated the electrokinetic conversions in fluid-saturated borehole models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%