2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streaming Potential Collection and Data Processing Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Reppert and Morgan (2001), Scott (2006), and Revil and Florsch (2010), the impact of the pore width on the recorded SIP response can be considered of secondary importance. This is primarily due to the comparatively large sizes of the pore throats of both non-compacted and compacted samples considered in this study, which in turn points to the generally subordinate contribution of pore throat and membrane effects to the observed SIP response for unconsolidated sandy sediments in the frequency range below the Maxwell-Wagner effect.…”
Section: Sip Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Reppert and Morgan (2001), Scott (2006), and Revil and Florsch (2010), the impact of the pore width on the recorded SIP response can be considered of secondary importance. This is primarily due to the comparatively large sizes of the pore throats of both non-compacted and compacted samples considered in this study, which in turn points to the generally subordinate contribution of pore throat and membrane effects to the observed SIP response for unconsolidated sandy sediments in the frequency range below the Maxwell-Wagner effect.…”
Section: Sip Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the equations that describe the streaming potential coefficient are linear below the transition frequency and there is no evidence that they become nonlinear above that frequency, it has not yet been shown that such an approach can be made to work for streaming potential coupling coefficient measurements on rocks. The processing of such data has, however, been discussed at length in Reppert and Morgan [5]; they mention that inertial effects may be seen if the transient signal has strong enough high-frequency components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency-dependent streaming potential coefficients were calculated using the methods described in Reppert et al [9] and Reppert and Morgan [5], the most important step being the renormalisation of the data taking into account of the frequency-dependent impedance of the sample and measuring circuit, which is shown for each sample at each of the measurement frequencies in Figure 2. This procedure ensures that the streaming potential coefficient is calculated with the correct sample conductivity, that is, that which relates to the frequency of the data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency effect on the coupling coefficient [40][41][42] for the Inada granite with the present experiment system has been reported in [27]. Coupling coefficient does not depend on frequency in such a low frequency range (0.01-1 Hz) for the intact Inada granite.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 50%