2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Streamflow prediction in “geopolitically ungauged” basins using satellite observations and regionalization at subcontinental scale

Abstract: Highlights Hydrology of the entire Greater Mekong region was modeled with HYPE.  Regionalization was obtained by similarity in physiography and climate.  Regionalization reached 80% of performance of local calibration at ungauged basins.  Water level based flow correlation helped evaluate model at ungauged basins.  Flow correlation framework outperformed the current metrics of modeled water level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…GM-HYPE v1.3 was calibrated and validated across 13 main river basins in the GM region using data from 1991 to 2009 (Du et al, 2020) and the GM setup is based on the HYPE hydrological model structure (see Appendix 1 from Lindström et al, 2010). The performance of GM-HYPE v1.3 was statistically evaluated at 58 gauge stations with Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), and CC of 0.66, 0.76, and 0.85 (median values), respectively, during the model calibration period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009), with 68% of stations having NSE values equal or greater than 0.5) and 0.65, 0.72, and 0.86 (median values), respectively, during the validation period (1991-2001, with 73% of stations having NSE values equal or greater than 0.5; see Table S4 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Multi-basin Hydrological Model Gm_hypementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GM-HYPE v1.3 was calibrated and validated across 13 main river basins in the GM region using data from 1991 to 2009 (Du et al, 2020) and the GM setup is based on the HYPE hydrological model structure (see Appendix 1 from Lindström et al, 2010). The performance of GM-HYPE v1.3 was statistically evaluated at 58 gauge stations with Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), and CC of 0.66, 0.76, and 0.85 (median values), respectively, during the model calibration period (2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009), with 68% of stations having NSE values equal or greater than 0.5) and 0.65, 0.72, and 0.86 (median values), respectively, during the validation period (1991-2001, with 73% of stations having NSE values equal or greater than 0.5; see Table S4 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Multi-basin Hydrological Model Gm_hypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. Detailed description of other data (e.g., temperature, topography) can be found in Du et al (2020).…”
Section: Study Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Como foi possível observar, em geral, grande parte dos estudos utilizam abordagens de regionalização com relação à similaridade climática e fisiográfica e/ou que calibram simultaneamente várias regiões com características semelhantes (DU et al, 2020). Ou seja, independente da metodologia a ser aplicada, a escolha de parâmetros explicativos da variável a ser regionalizada é uma etapa crucial, devendo ser selecionados aqueles que melhor representam as principais características do regime hidrológico da região (PRIETO et al, 2019).…”
Section: Em Um Estudo Realizado Na Bacia Do Alto Do São Francisco (Mgunclassified
“…Contudo, para uma análise mais minuciosa da influência das chuvas nos modelos é importante, a partir dos modelos aqui propostos, realizar mais estudos acerca da sazonalidade na região, visto que a região possui duas estações bem definidas, sendo a sazonalidade um fator importante na disponibilidade hídrica de uma região(BESKOW et al, 2016).Apesar do bom desempenho dos modelos hidrológicos em escala global, vale ressaltar que nem sempre eles apresentam desempenho satisfatório em todas as estações de seus domínios territoriais, assim, restringe-se sua aplicação para fins de gerenciamento(DU et al, 2020). Desse modo, os modelos hidrológicos representam uma importante ferramenta na gestão dos recursos hídricos, principalmente em países em desenvolvimento, como o Brasil, em que a disponibilidade de dados observados ao longo do território é baixa e recente.…”
unclassified