2005
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream network expansion: a riparian water quality factor

Abstract: Little is known about how active stream network expansion during rainstorms influences the ability of riparian buffers to improve water quality. We used aerial photographs to quantify stream network expansion during the wet winter season in five agricultural catchments in western Oregon, USA. Winter stream drainage densities were nearly two orders of magnitude greater than summer stream densities, and agricultural land use was much more abundant along transient portions (e.g. swales, road ditches) of stream ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
3
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perennial stream density in the Northern Rockies ecoregion is relatively high and the values reported range from 0.9 km km −2 to 1.2 km km −2 (McIntosh et al, 1995). Wigington et al (2005) reported that perennial stream density of agricultural watersheds in western Oregon varies from 0.24 km km −2 to 0.66 km km −2 even though the total stream density varies from 2.90 km km −2 to 8.00 km km −2 . The perennial stream density for the four case study watersheds located in western Oregon are 0.1 km km −2 (USGS gage 14308000), 0.26 km km −2 (USGS gage 11497500), 0.29 km km −2 (USGS gage 14080500), and 0.67 km km −2 (USGS gage 11532500) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Perennial stream density in the Northern Rockies ecoregion is relatively high and the values reported range from 0.9 km km −2 to 1.2 km km −2 (McIntosh et al, 1995). Wigington et al (2005) reported that perennial stream density of agricultural watersheds in western Oregon varies from 0.24 km km −2 to 0.66 km km −2 even though the total stream density varies from 2.90 km km −2 to 8.00 km km −2 . The perennial stream density for the four case study watersheds located in western Oregon are 0.1 km km −2 (USGS gage 14308000), 0.26 km km −2 (USGS gage 11497500), 0.29 km km −2 (USGS gage 14080500), and 0.67 km km −2 (USGS gage 11532500) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another surprising thing that I learned from these sampling campaigns is that the springs located in the upper part of the catchment are the dominant source for baseflow (Fig. 10a, (Wigington et al, 2005;Godsey and Kirchner, 2014;Jensen et al, 2017) (Fig. 10b, letter G).…”
Section: P a P E R A C C E P T E D P R E -P R I N T V E R S I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all studied watersheds, intermittent farm streams without a forest cover accounted for more stream length than perennial farm streams without a forest cover ( Table 2), suggesting that these intermittent streams are major recipients of nutrient, pesticide and sediment pollution. Although not considered in this study, it would be very useful to map ephemeral streams, road side ditches, swales and surface field drainage ditches in agricultural watersheds, as they are key hydrological features that should also be considered for riparian buffer establishment [93]. Figure 2.…”
Section: Watershed (Pairedmentioning
confidence: 99%