Self-Sustaining Solutions for Streams, Wetlands, and Watersheds, 12-15, September 2004
DOI: 10.13031/2013.17416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream Modules: Spreadsheet Tools for River Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All channel survey data were entered into the Reference Reach Spreadsheet in the STREAMS Modules to reduce channel survey data and to calculate bankfull dimensions, slope, sinuosity and sediment distribution (Mecklenburg and Ward, 2004). Bankfull flow, stream force and stream power value estimates were derived from the survey data to aid in the analysis and modelling of stream form and process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All channel survey data were entered into the Reference Reach Spreadsheet in the STREAMS Modules to reduce channel survey data and to calculate bankfull dimensions, slope, sinuosity and sediment distribution (Mecklenburg and Ward, 2004). Bankfull flow, stream force and stream power value estimates were derived from the survey data to aid in the analysis and modelling of stream form and process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The variable B (Wbkf) represents the width of the surface water, while H (dbkf) represents the average depth. The parameters were computed at a bank full discharge condition [3]. The estimation of mean depth (H) involved dividing the channel area (A) by the surface water width (B).…”
Section: River Morphological Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-stage channel design was performed using The Reference Reach Spreadsheet developed by Mecklenburg and Ward, 23 where the recommended ratio of flooded width to low-flow channel width is between 3:1 and 5:1. 5,13 At the Mullenbach site, the minimum recommended ratio of 3:1 was used, in order to reduce excavation costs and reduce the land loss of adjacent agricultural fields.…”
Section: Two-stage Ditch Designmentioning
confidence: 99%