1997
DOI: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/140/1997/289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream faunas and ecoregions in South Island, New Zealand: do they correspond?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harding et al (1997) also found that invertebrate communities differed among South Island ecoregions in a more consistent way than indicated by water chemistry (e.g., pH). These authors stressed the importance of climate, geomorphology, catchment, and past biogeographical events as drivers of these observed patterns.…”
Section: Invertebrate Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Harding et al (1997) also found that invertebrate communities differed among South Island ecoregions in a more consistent way than indicated by water chemistry (e.g., pH). These authors stressed the importance of climate, geomorphology, catchment, and past biogeographical events as drivers of these observed patterns.…”
Section: Invertebrate Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Thus, it is probably not surprising that we found few differences in the physical and chemical conditions of these three Christchurch waterways. In general, pH was circum-neutral, and specific conductivity was higher than levels recorded in 100 similar sized streams in a variety of rural catchments throughout the South Island (Harding et al 1997). Although alkalinity differed between -m streams, we suspect the differences were so small as to have little ecological significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the density and diversity of invertebrates in the ultramafic streams were also lower than has been found in other New Zealand rivers and streams with similar elevations (e.g. Quinn and Hickey 1990b;Harding et al 1997). This suggests other features of the stream environment were a primary reason for the low diversity and density of macroinvertebrate communities in the ultramafic streams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%