2020
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2020.2964616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stray Loss Model for Induction Motors With Using Equivalent Circuit Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, variation of SL with P Out (i.e. f 1 (P out ) in ( 22)) is recognised as reported in [23] i.e., f 1 (P Out ) =…”
Section: A Sl Model Structurementioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, variation of SL with P Out (i.e. f 1 (P out ) in ( 22)) is recognised as reported in [23] i.e., f 1 (P Out ) =…”
Section: A Sl Model Structurementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Development of an empirical model is, hence, the most suitable option to account quantitatively the SL. [23] presents an empirical SL model for grid-connected IMs, which includes the impact of motor geometry on SL as well. The model in [23] uses motor inductances, the number of pole pairs and, output power as input variables.…”
Section: Proposed Sl Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rajendra Kumar et al . selected two equivalent circuit parameters, namely leakage inductance and magnetizing inductance, to construct different index formulas and modeled the stray losses [3]. The loss tests were implemented to confirm the most appropriate model that was proved to be more accurate than the past one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajendra Kumar et al selected two equivalent circuit parameters, namely leakage inductance and magnetizing inductance, to construct different a Correspondence to: Xiaohua Bao. E-mail: hfutbxh@163.com School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China index formulas and modeled the stray losses [3]. The loss tests were implemented to confirm the most appropriate model that was proved to be more accurate than the past one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%