1995
DOI: 10.1038/373055a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic evidence for an early collision between northwest India and Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
224
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 455 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
224
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The end of marine sedimentation and the first onlap of fluvio-deltaic sediments and redbeds on the Indian northern passive margin in the western Himalaya is dated as foraminiferal Zone P8 (38), correlative with Chron C22r of latest Early Eocene age [Ϸ50.5 Ma (39,40)]. This first direct timing constraint on the initiation of collision between India and Asia has stood up well (41)(42)(43) and is supported, for example, by field studies in northwest Pakistan, where the suture and Indian craton were overlapped by shallow-marine strata of latest Early Eocene age (Zone P9), showing that suturing was largely completed by Ϸ49 Ma (44). Evidence of subduction and final collision derives also from the occurrence of island arc volcanics and related intrusives, and massive calc-alkaline plutonism associated with the last major pulse dated at Ϸ50 Ma in the Ladakh Himalayas, for example (45)(46)(47).…”
Section: Drift Of India and Collision With Eurasiamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The end of marine sedimentation and the first onlap of fluvio-deltaic sediments and redbeds on the Indian northern passive margin in the western Himalaya is dated as foraminiferal Zone P8 (38), correlative with Chron C22r of latest Early Eocene age [Ϸ50.5 Ma (39,40)]. This first direct timing constraint on the initiation of collision between India and Asia has stood up well (41)(42)(43) and is supported, for example, by field studies in northwest Pakistan, where the suture and Indian craton were overlapped by shallow-marine strata of latest Early Eocene age (Zone P9), showing that suturing was largely completed by Ϸ49 Ma (44). Evidence of subduction and final collision derives also from the occurrence of island arc volcanics and related intrusives, and massive calc-alkaline plutonism associated with the last major pulse dated at Ϸ50 Ma in the Ladakh Himalayas, for example (45)(46)(47).…”
Section: Drift Of India and Collision With Eurasiamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…After the successful colonization of Asia by lorisids, a split occurred Ϸ29-47 mya into the genera Nycticebus, which subsequently invaded wide areas of southeast Asia, and Loris. The latter migrated into the Indian subcontinent during a period when the landmass was already connected with the Asian mainland (49).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the age of the most recent common ancestor of the primate order is still uncertain, our estimate was calibrated with the 50 (6), 61 (4), and 80 (45,46) The Indo-Madagascar continent split from the African mainland Ϸ165 mya and reached its current position Ϸ400 km east of Africa Ϸ121 mya (47). Later, Ϸ88 mya, the Indian subcontinent split from Madagascar (48), drifting north-eastward and colliding with Asia Ϸ56-66 mya (49). In agreement with previous work (40), a colonization of Madagascar by a Gondwanan vicariance, via a chain of islands or even a continuing land bridge linking the island and Africa during the middle Eocene and the early Miocene, is outside the estimated temporal window of 47-80 mya and can therefore be rejected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of initial collision of the Indian plate with Eurasia has been debated [Cochran, 1990;Butler, 1995] (also see discussion from Uddin and Lundberg [1998]). Data bearing on the timing of collision come mainly from areas west of the central Himalayas [e.g., Beck et al, 1995;Najman et al, 1997]. Although most workers suggest that the leading edge of India began to collide with Eurasia in a so-called "soft" collision around 55 Ma [i.e., Sclater and Fisher, 1974], others propose an earlier collision at about 70 Ma [i.e., Yin and Harrison, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%