2019
DOI: 10.1017/s003329171900165x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratifying major depressive disorder by polygenic risk for schizophrenia in relation to structural brain measures

Abstract: BackgroundSubstantial clinical heterogeneity of major depressive disorder (MDD) suggests it may group together individuals with diverse aetiologies. Identifying distinct subtypes should lead to more effective diagnosis and treatment, while providing more useful targets for further research. Genetic and clinical overlap between MDD and schizophrenia (SCZ) suggests an MDD subtype may share underlying mechanisms with SCZ.MethodsThe present study investigated whether a neurobiologically distinct subtype of MDD cou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In UK Biobank, T1‐weighted imaging data was collected at one site (Cheadle) with a 3T scanner (Siemens Skyra), following the standard and freely available UK Biobank imaging and quality control protocols (Alfaro‐Almagro et al, 2018; Smith, Alfaro‐Almagro, & Miller, 2018; UK Biobank, 2014). Brain morphometric measures for N = 10,109 T1‐weighted scans were derived locally with FreeSurfer version 5.3 and quality controlled (Supplementary section S1.1.3; Harris et al, 2019; Neilson et al, 2019; Ritchie et al, 2018). After quality control, measures for N = 8,959 participants were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In UK Biobank, T1‐weighted imaging data was collected at one site (Cheadle) with a 3T scanner (Siemens Skyra), following the standard and freely available UK Biobank imaging and quality control protocols (Alfaro‐Almagro et al, 2018; Smith, Alfaro‐Almagro, & Miller, 2018; UK Biobank, 2014). Brain morphometric measures for N = 10,109 T1‐weighted scans were derived locally with FreeSurfer version 5.3 and quality controlled (Supplementary section S1.1.3; Harris et al, 2019; Neilson et al, 2019; Ritchie et al, 2018). After quality control, measures for N = 8,959 participants were included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger samples and meta-analytic approaches represent good strategies to overcome issues associated with small sample sizes. Large-scale data collection initiatives with harmonized assessments (including neuroimaging), such as the population-based UK Biobank study (N = 500,000) 15 , are yielding key insights into brain mechanisms involved in MDD (e.g., Howard et al 16 ; Shen et al 17 ; Harris et al 18 ). However, recruiting large samples is not always feasible because of limited access to patient populations at any one site or limited availability of scanning facilities and the financial costs of scanning hundreds or even thousands of participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the influence of potential confounding factors associated with brain abnormalities in psychiatric disorders has often been neglected. Most previous studies on PRS for MDD and schizophrenia did not consider those factors [54,69,70], and this was the case in prior PRS-anhedonia analyses [6]. Our sensitivity analyses controlled for childhood traumatic events, adulthood traumatic events, medication use, depressed mood, Townsend social deprivation index, education qualification, body mass index, current tobacco use and alcohol intake frequency.…”
Section: Integrating Findings Of Morphometric Measures and White Matter Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%