2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6346-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratified reconstruction of ancestral Escherichia coli diversification

Abstract: BackgroundPhylogenetic analyses of the bacterial genomes based on the simple classification in core- genes and accessory genes pools could offer an incomplete view of the evolutionary processes, of which some are still unresolved. A combined strategy based on stratified phylogeny and ancient molecular polymorphisms is proposed to infer detailed evolutionary reconstructions by using a large number of whole genomes. This strategy, based on the highest number of genomes available in public databases, was evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the phylogroups D and F, which are not close in the species tree, cluster together in terms of gene repertoires. This may explain the conflicting results of our phylogenetic analysis, which places with high confidence the phylogroup D in the same partition of A and B1, and works based on ancestral gene repertoires that place them as a basal group in the tree (not far from F and G) [49]. Hence, phylogroups differ in terms of their gene repertoires and in their rates of genetic diversification, but while some are quite similar (A and B1), others (B2) stand aside from the remaining phylogroups.…”
Section: Plos Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Interestingly, the phylogroups D and F, which are not close in the species tree, cluster together in terms of gene repertoires. This may explain the conflicting results of our phylogenetic analysis, which places with high confidence the phylogroup D in the same partition of A and B1, and works based on ancestral gene repertoires that place them as a basal group in the tree (not far from F and G) [49]. Hence, phylogroups differ in terms of their gene repertoires and in their rates of genetic diversification, but while some are quite similar (A and B1), others (B2) stand aside from the remaining phylogroups.…”
Section: Plos Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This means that the complexity of ancestor niches was either simpler, or at least relatively simpler, that is, dominated by a few powerful conditions, or were simply insufficiently dug up, exploited and far from their carrying capacity. The search for cores by using stratified phylogenies in successive supraspecific and subspecific taxons supports such a hypothesis ( Gonzalez-Alba et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Niche Variability Core Genomes and Accessory Genomesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Thus, the distribution of pipolins limited to phylogroups A, B1, C and D may be due to the restricted mobility beyond those groups. In line with this, these phylogenetic groups have been proposed to belong to different ancient lineages 24 , downplaying a strict vertical transmission of pipolins throughout the evolutionary diversification of E. coli phylogroups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%