Stratified Growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms

Abstract

In this study, stratified patterns of protein synthesis and growth were demonstrated in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Spatial patterns of protein synthetic activity inside biofilms were characterized by the use of two green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene constructs. One construct carried an isopropyl-␤-Dthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible gfpmut2 gene encoding a stable GFP. The second construct carried a GFP derivative, gfp-AGA, encoding an unstable GFP under the control of the growth-rate-dependent rrnBp 1 promoter. Both GFP reporters indicated that active protein synthesis was restricted to a narrow band in the part of the biofilm adjacent to the source of oxygen. The zone of active GFP expression was approximately 60 m wide in colony biofilms and 30 m wide in flow cell biofilms. The region of the biofilm in which cells were capable of elongation was mapped by treating colony biofilms with carbenicillin, which blocks cell division, and then measuring individual cell lengths by transmission electron microscopy. Cell elongation was localized at the air interface of the biofilm. The heterogeneous anabolic patterns measured inside these biofilms were likely a result of oxygen limitation in the biofilm. Oxygen microelectrode measurements showed that oxygen only penetrated approximately 50 m into the biofilm. P. aeruginosa was incapable of anaerobic growth in the medium used for this investigation. These results show that while mature P. aeruginosa biofilms contain active, growing cells, they can also harbor large numbers of cells that are inactive and not growing.Biofilms are communities of microorganisms that are associated with surfaces. Cell clusters in biofilms are known to be characterized by gradients in the concentrations of oxygen, nutrients, and metabolic waste products. It is widely recognized that such chemical heterogeneity in microbial biofilms can lead to microorganisms in the biofilm exhibiting different rates of growth and metabolic activity. Even pure cultures of microorganisms growing in biofilms experience these gradients and may exist in a range of metabolic states. The variety of growth states that can be represented in a biofilm, even for a single species, surely contributes to the special ecology and antimicrobial tolerance manifested by biofilms. Given the fundamental significance of growth status, it is surprising that there have been few investigations in which the growth patterns in biofilms have been visualized.Several studies have investigated spatial patterns of cellular activity inside biofilms, using approaches such as staining with nucleic acid dyes that differentially indicate DNA and RNA (17), hybridization to 16S rRNA with fluorescently tagged oligonucleotide probes (9), the induction of alkaline phosphatase followed by staining with a fluorogenic phosphatase substrate (8,19), and green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression from a growth-rate-dependent promoter (11). These previous investigations have revealed gradients in metabolic activity in biofilms.The purpose ...

Extracellular enzymes affect biofilm formation of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa

“…The combination of both biofilm growth models is a strategy often used to obtain complementary information about different structural and functional aspects of biofilms (e.g. Mah et al, 2003;Werner et al, 2004;Waite et al, 2005). The same relationships in enzyme activities between the mutants and the parent strain were found even in APM liquid cultures and PIA-grown biofilms.…”

The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms

“…In contrast, the conditions at the surface of the biofilm are aerobic and allow more growth and metabolic activity [23][24]. Gradients, therefore, characterize biofilms.…”

Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community

“…It is thought that biofilm structure results in microenvironments due to gradients of nutrients, oxygen, and selfgenerated signals (Werner et al 2004;Rani et al 2007). These microenvironments, coupled with the bistable states described for many differentiation processes, have been proposed to ultimately lead to different cell types in specific regions of the biofilm (Raser and O'Shea 2005;Kolter and Greenberg 2006).…”