2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy work in the public sector—A balancing act of competing discourses

Abstract: This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this first round of coding our aim was to catch both varieties and similarities in the material. We therefore tried to be as inclusive as possible (Höglund & Svärdsten 2018). Further, in this first round of coding, we sought both explicit accounts and implicit accounts of relational work on social media (Potter & Wetherell, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this first round of coding our aim was to catch both varieties and similarities in the material. We therefore tried to be as inclusive as possible (Höglund & Svärdsten 2018). Further, in this first round of coding, we sought both explicit accounts and implicit accounts of relational work on social media (Potter & Wetherell, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early modern times, the political philosophy of Niccolo Machiavelli testifies to the entwining of individual, group, and communal strategies Machiavelli (2009Machiavelli ( [1517). Individuals strive to get somewhere, in factions, which similarly strategize, as part of cities and states, with an emergent agency allowing them to strategize as collectives (Höglund & Svärdsten, 2018;Kornberger & Engberg-Pedersen, 2019). For the classics, it was already apparent that strategy is inherently implicated in power relations, as it often envisions a change of power relations, and entails the use of power, either through coercion, persuasion, or the reshaping of perceptions, either openly or in the shade (Flyvbjerg, 1998;Vasquez, 1998).…”
Section: Strategy and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the resulting reality looks like the original intention, the assessment can differ because of intervening changes in governance and in the values and perspectives of the community at large (Van Assche et al, 2012). Often, however, the situation in environmental governance is much tougher, as social-ecological systems are at stake, with systems boundaries rendering observation difficult (De Roo, 2017;Van Assche, Verschraegen, Valentinov, et al, 2019;Walker et al, 2006), with complex systems involved, with distant time horizons, and partial understandings and competing discourses at play (Höglund & Svärdsten, 2018). Thus, even if uncertainty is always part of the game, some situations are explicitly recognized and labeled as 'uncertain', while other are not (e.g.…”
Section: Dealing With Uncertainty: Adaptation Transition Intermediatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litteraturen om offentlig sektor innovation er omfattende og informationsrig (Aaen et al, 2018;Halvorsen et al, 2005;Hansen & Jakobsen, 2013;Røste, 2005;Osborne & Brown, 2011;Vries et al, 2016), men der har generelt vaeret meget lidt fokus på, hvad det er for nogle relationelle processer, der er konstituerende for innovationsprocessen, og hvad de betyder for kvaliteten af innovationsprocessen (Hoholm & Araujo, 2011). Studier med fokus på relationelle processer har fremhaevet, hvordan relationel laering i teams kan have en positiv effekt på innovations outcomes (Leal-Rodríguez et al, 2014), hvordan konkurrerende diskurser enten kan haemme eller fremme udvikling (Höglund & Svärdsten, 2018), og hvordan "forhandlede meninger" og forskellige dialogformer er med til at skabe mening i innovationsprojekter (Brix, 2017). Litteraturen om teamlaering fremhaever endvidere fordelene ved at innovere i teams -navnlig i teams med forskellige fagligheder -men litteraturen fremhaever samtidig også, hvor svaert det er i praksis at få et team til at innovere (Edmondson & Nembhard, 2009;Edmonson & Harvey, 2018).…”
Section: Problemfeltunclassified