2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy Use in Second Language Vocabulary Learning and Its Relationships With the Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge: A Structural Equation Modeling Study

Abstract: This study investigated Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners' use of vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) and its relationship with vocabulary knowledge (VK), especially in relation to proficiency, gender, and discipline. Structural equation models were established following exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) procedures, and mediation analyses and multiple-group analyses, as well as analyses of variance, were conducted. Four hundred nineteen sophomores' st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, based on the hypothesized path model, the SEM parameters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. In addition, the model was assessed by the following model t indexes, with the values in parentheses indicating the cutoffs for acceptable t [47,48]: (1) the chi-square value ( ); (2) the chi-square degrees of freedom ( /DF<5); (3) the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA ≤ 0.08); (4) the comparative t index (CFI ≥ 0.90); (5) the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI ≥ 0.90); and (6) the incremental t index (IFI≥ 0.90). All statistical tests were two-sided with the level of signi cance set at 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, based on the hypothesized path model, the SEM parameters were estimated by the maximum likelihood method. In addition, the model was assessed by the following model t indexes, with the values in parentheses indicating the cutoffs for acceptable t [47,48]: (1) the chi-square value ( ); (2) the chi-square degrees of freedom ( /DF<5); (3) the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA ≤ 0.08); (4) the comparative t index (CFI ≥ 0.90); (5) the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI ≥ 0.90); and (6) the incremental t index (IFI≥ 0.90). All statistical tests were two-sided with the level of signi cance set at 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the chi-square value is sensitive to large sample sizes, it is necessary to check other goodness-of-t indices [39,40]. The following model tting indices were tested to evaluate the model (the values in parentheses indicating the cutoffs for acceptable t) [41,42]: (1) the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA ≤ 0.08); (2) the comparative t index (CFI ≥ 0.90); (3) the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI ≥ 0.90); and (4) the normed t index (NFI ≥ 0.90). and ( 5) the incremental t index (IFI ≥ 0.90).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the test has good discrimination validity. Since 2001, the Vocabulary Levels Test (Version 2) has been widely used in vocabulary assessment and vocabulary research studies (Stæhr, 2009 ; Akbarian, 2010 ; Zhang, 2011 , 2012 ; Ma and Lin, 2015 ; Wang, 2015 ; Zhang and Lu, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%