2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy use in L2 Chinese reading: The effect of L1 background and L2 proficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings are also in agreement with Graesser [21] who indicated that both L 1 reading strategy transfer and the students' L 2 proficiency could contribute to their L 2 reading. The findings were also in conformity with the above findings discussed so far (Alderson, 1984;Bernhardt, & Kamala, 1995;Ke, & Chan, 2017). Comparatively, their reading ability in students' L 1 was better most probably because of their linguistic mastery as it is their L 1 for almost all the students studied.…”
Section: Discussion Of Quantitative Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The above findings are also in agreement with Graesser [21] who indicated that both L 1 reading strategy transfer and the students' L 2 proficiency could contribute to their L 2 reading. The findings were also in conformity with the above findings discussed so far (Alderson, 1984;Bernhardt, & Kamala, 1995;Ke, & Chan, 2017). Comparatively, their reading ability in students' L 1 was better most probably because of their linguistic mastery as it is their L 1 for almost all the students studied.…”
Section: Discussion Of Quantitative Datasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, LTH (initially termed short-circuit hypothesis), favors the assumption that students' reading L 2 proficiency is the key aspect for their L 2 reading ability. The assumption here is that as proficiency level grows, reading comprehension ability level catches up (Chu-Chang, 1981;Ke, & Chan, 2017). Different studies also indicated inconsistencies inclining linguistic knowledge as powerful predictor.…”
Section: Lih and Lthmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations