2003
DOI: 10.1517/eoph.4.9.1525.21059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy to manage the treatment of severe psoriasis: considerations of efficacy, safety and cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most evaluations were cost‐effectiveness analyses (43 of 71 comparisons, 22 of 37 papers) or cost–utility analyses (25 of 71 comparisons, 17 of 37 papers) . Three cost–benefit comparisons met inclusion criteria .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most evaluations were cost‐effectiveness analyses (43 of 71 comparisons, 22 of 37 papers) or cost–utility analyses (25 of 71 comparisons, 17 of 37 papers) . Three cost–benefit comparisons met inclusion criteria .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three cost–benefit comparisons met inclusion criteria . Most papers (57 of 71 comparisons, 30 of 37 papers) reported modelling studies synthesizing data from several sources. Four articles (seven of 71 comparisons) were randomized controlled trial (RCT) based and three articles (seven of 71 comparisons) used observational designs …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 Prof. Ferguson felt that TL01 was probably the first choice for chronic plaque psoriasis but said that, in his experience, some patients do better with PUVA in terms of both time of clearance and remission time, and urged people not to throw away their PUVA cabinets. In a cost-efficacy study, Feldman et al 48 considered that UVB phototherapy appears to be the best first-line agent for the control of psoriasis, with methotrexate, PUVA and the biological treatments, second-line agents, the choice of which requires considerable patient input and physician judgement. 48 Nijsten and Stern 49 revealed that the nonmelanoma skin cancer risk for PUVA patients is high for patients with high levels of PUVA exposure.…”
Section: Dermatopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a cost-efficacy study, Feldman et al 48 considered that UVB phototherapy appears to be the best first-line agent for the control of psoriasis, with methotrexate, PUVA and the biological treatments, second-line agents, the choice of which requires considerable patient input and physician judgement. 48 Nijsten and Stern 49 revealed that the nonmelanoma skin cancer risk for PUVA patients is high for patients with high levels of PUVA exposure. For at least 15 years after stopping PUVA in psoriasis, the risk to patients of developing a SCC is not reduced.…”
Section: Dermatopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%