The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0696-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy to develop efficient grid system for flow analysis around two-dimensional bluff bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the domain top and bottom surface, a slip type boundary condition (∂u/∂y = 0 and v = 0) was applied. Further details of the numerical schemes used to discretize the governing equations and justification of the considered domain size can be found in Haque et al [5,12]. OpenFOAM was used as a solver in the present investigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the domain top and bottom surface, a slip type boundary condition (∂u/∂y = 0 and v = 0) was applied. Further details of the numerical schemes used to discretize the governing equations and justification of the considered domain size can be found in Haque et al [5,12]. OpenFOAM was used as a solver in the present investigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the computational domain used in simulations are given in Figure 2. For a 2D analysis, Best Practice Guidance suggests that the extent of the computational domain should be based on the depth (D) of the building in plan-view to ensure that the interaction of boundaries with the structure is minimized [12]. The chosen upstream and downstream model dimensions are based on the recommended minimum values of 5D and 10D, respectively [7,13].…”
Section: Computational Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen upstream and downstream model dimensions are based on the recommended minimum values of 5D and 10D, respectively [7,13]. Furthermore, the distance from the top and bottom boundaries and the outside of the structure should not be less than 6D [12], and so the height of the domain was chosen to equal 13D. In terms of blockage ratio-the combined length of the building's width and the fin's depth 'd', as a proportion of the height of the domain-the assigned problem has a maximum of 7.7% (where the façade configuration has the fin connected directly to the building, 'g' = 0 mm), which satisfies the acceptable upper limit of less than 10% [6].…”
Section: Computational Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations