2023
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03285-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy To Assess Zoonotic Potential Reveals Low Risk Posed by SARS-Related Coronaviruses from Bat and Pangolin

Abstract: Evaluation of the zoonotic risk of animal SARSr-CoVs is important for future disease preparedness. However, there are misconceptions regarding the risk of animal viruses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…52,53 Both WIV1 and RaTG13 originate from horseshoe bats, suggesting that the bat ACE2 receptor is lenient with respect to the fold of this loop, as at least two different conformations are permissive for bat ACE2 binding and cell entry, and three are permissive for human ACE2. 23,24,52,53,56 In the absence of a civet ACE2-bound spike structure, it is unknown if civet spikes are evolutionarily restricted by their corresponding civet ACE2 receptors from adopting a similar loop confirmation as that of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…52,53 Both WIV1 and RaTG13 originate from horseshoe bats, suggesting that the bat ACE2 receptor is lenient with respect to the fold of this loop, as at least two different conformations are permissive for bat ACE2 binding and cell entry, and three are permissive for human ACE2. 23,24,52,53,56 In the absence of a civet ACE2-bound spike structure, it is unknown if civet spikes are evolutionarily restricted by their corresponding civet ACE2 receptors from adopting a similar loop confirmation as that of SARS-CoV-2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro techniquesRecently, bat IFNs have been included in many in vitro studies. The majority of the research involved infecting bat cells with viruses (SARS-CoVs, Hendra and Marburg viruses) and measuring the induced expression level and antiviral response [107][108][109]. Various studies have compared the differences in antiviral IFN and IFNrelated gene responses between mammals and bats 110,111.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%