2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4610-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy of arm movement control is determined by minimization of neural effort for joint coordination

Abstract: Optimality criteria underlying organization of arm movements are often validated by testing their ability to adequately predict hand trajectories. However, kinematic redundancy of the arm allows production of the same hand trajectory through different joint coordination patterns. We therefore consider movement optimality at the level of joint coordination patterns. A review of studies of multi-joint movement control suggests that a 'trailing' pattern of joint control is consistently observed during which a sin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the cost of neural effort for information processing should be taken into account (Dounskaia & Shimansky 2016;. Decision making is based on processing sensory information and integrating it with internal representations of past experience.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Neural Effort In Cost Function Can Explain Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the cost of neural effort for information processing should be taken into account (Dounskaia & Shimansky 2016;. Decision making is based on processing sensory information and integrating it with internal representations of past experience.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Neural Effort In Cost Function Can Explain Percmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the human motor control system prefers the constancy of some parameters, for example the+ Dealt with in this study, relevant to the production of a movement in motor planning to the optimization of criterion functions, that is often hard to achieve, it allows us to conjecture the easiness of computation (Karniel, 2013;Dounskaia, 2016), as the criterion that the human motor control system respects in motor planning. It has to be made clear, how such mathematical parameters that are assumed to be constant, during a movement are interpreted in the biological system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, an application of the principle of the neurocomputational cost minimization to human movement control suggests that a learning process contributes to emergence of strategies that minimize the use of cognitive resources. This hypothesis is supported, for example, by an observation that more skillful movement performance is associated with the use of a more pronounced trailing joint control pattern, that is, the more intensive use of passive torques and spinal neural circuitries for production of training joint motion (Dounskaia and Shimansky 2016).…”
Section: Uncovering Cognitive Constraints Is the Bottleneck In Resourmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated the trailing joint control pattern during various types of arm movements (for review, see Dounskaia 2005;. As discussed by Dounskaia and Shimansky (2016), this pattern is a result of movement optimization, which is apparent from a tendency to maximally exploit passive torques for rotation of the trailing joint and from an observation that the contribution of passive torques to control of the trailing joint increases with development of skill. Dounskaia and Shimansky (2016) used the information theory to show that the trailing pattern decreases the neurocomputational cost by reducing the amount of information that needs to be processed for joint coordination.…”
Section: Uncovering Cognitive Constraints Is the Bottleneck In Resourmentioning
confidence: 99%