2002
DOI: 10.1080/03050620210389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy and Selection in International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I derive an alternative version that does not suffer from sample selection bias. I show how this estimator differs from the one proposed by Signorino (2002) and is a novel addition to the empirical researchers toolbox. 1 In the next two subsections I will lay out the basic theoretical model that underlies the observed behavior of actors and the corresponding statistical model (an agent error strategic estimator).…”
Section: Empirical Models Based On Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…I derive an alternative version that does not suffer from sample selection bias. I show how this estimator differs from the one proposed by Signorino (2002) and is a novel addition to the empirical researchers toolbox. 1 In the next two subsections I will lay out the basic theoretical model that underlies the observed behavior of actors and the corresponding statistical model (an agent error strategic estimator).…”
Section: Empirical Models Based On Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Signorino, 2002, 106). This seems to be the implicit message which many scholars took from Signorino (2002) -what has been subsequently adopted by researchers is unfortunately not a strategy that delivers unbiased estimates when facing selection. One has the impression that most readers gained the supposed insight that strategic estimators outperform bivariate selection models (Heckman-type bivariate probit).…”
Section: Selection In Strategic Estimators: Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations