Strategies used by emergency care professionals to handle interpersonal difficulties with patients: a qualitative study

Abstract

ObjectivesIdentify the strategies implemented by emergency care professionals when facing tension and interpersonal violence from patients and their friends and family.DesignDescriptive qualitative study based on 38 semidirective interviews.ParticipantsDoctors, nurses, nursing assistants and administrative staff.SettingFour emergency departments (EDs) from three French university hospitals.ResultsAccording to the medical professionals interviewed, the difficulties that they encounter with patients or their accompanying family members can be explained by a lack of understanding of the functioning of EDs, by a general increase in individualistic behaviours leading to a lack of civility or by deviant behaviours (related to toxic substance abuse or mental illness). While managing deviant behaviours may sometimes require a collective intervention, ED staff also implement what are essentially individual communication strategies (with the use of rational explanation, seduction and empathy), confrontation or flight to deal with interpersonal difficulties.ConclusionsStrategies used by staff members tend to be individualised for the most part, and some, such as confrontational or escape strategies, may not be adapted to all situations. In the face of difficulties between staff and patients, mediators, specialised in resolving conflict, could entrust some cases to professionals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03139110).

“I think we still do too little”: measures to prevent violence and aggression in German emergency departments – a qualitative study

“…Those interventions were, for instance, explaining ED processes to impatient patients and their attendants, flight in case of physical encounter, or asking for help from experienced colleagues. Such personal strategies, which employees learn and implement on their own, have also been described in a previous study conducted by Charrier et al [ 21 ], e.g., communication strategies aiming at a reciprocal understanding with the patient to keep the interaction congenial. These measures were commonly applied by participants of the current study as well and one reason that was addressed was that these strategies were not dependent on financial resources and could be implemented without organisational efforts.…”

Effectiveness of educational intervention and cognitive rehearsal on perceived incivility among emergency nurses: a randomized controlled trial

“…Hosseinpour-Dalenjan et al (2019) showed that there is a high correlation between nurses' work engagement and patient or visitor incivility [ 26 ]. Charrier et al (2021) showed that nurses in the emergency department face lack of civility and deviant behaviors with patients and their accompanying family members, which requires strategies to manage the interpersonal difficulties [ 30 ]. An Iranian study showed that the incivility of physicians in the nursing workplace was the highest and the incivility of supervisors was the lowest [ 27 ].…”

The influence of supportive work environment on work‐related stress and conflict management style among emergency care nurses: A descriptive correlational study

“…This multifaceted context exacerbates the unique and demanding nature of nursing practice within EDs (Parvaresh‐Masoud et al., 2021). Conflict in the context of EDs is a prominent feature in nursing practice due to the complexity and stressful environment in which ED nurses provide care (Charrier et al., 2021). It can also increase the margin of error in the ED, which jeopardizes the safety and quality of rendered care (Labrague et al., 2018).…”