Strategies to expand corporate autonomy by the tobacco, alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage industry: a scoping review of reviews

Abstract

Background Noncommunicable diseases contribute to over 70% of global deaths each year. Efforts to address this epidemic are complicated by the presence of powerful corporate actors. Despite this, few attempts have been made to synthesize existing evidence of the strategies used to advance corporate interests across industries. Given this, our study seeks to answer the questions: 1) Is there an emergent taxonomy of strategies used by the tobacco, alcohol and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) industries to expand corporate autonomy? 2) How are these strategies similar and how are they different? Methods Under the guidance of a framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley, a scoping review was carried out whereby six databases were searched in June 2021 to identify relevant peer-reviewed literature. To be included in this review, studies had to explicitly discuss the strategies used by the tobacco, alcohol, and/or sugar-sweetened beverage multinational corporations and be considered review articles aimed to synthesize existing evidence from at least one of the three industries. Eight hundred and fifty-eight articles were selected for full review and 59 articles were retained for extraction, analysis, and categorization. Results Results identified six key strategies the industries used: 1) influencing government policy making and implementation, 2) challenging unfavorable science, 3) creating a positive image, 4) manipulating markets, 5) mounting legal challenges, and 6) anticipating future scenarios. Despite these similarities, there are few but important differences. Under the strategy of influencing government policy making and implementation, for example, literature showed that the alcohol and SSB industries have been “privileged with high levels of participation” within international public health organizations. Conclusions Understanding how industries resist efforts to control them is important for public health advocates working to reduce consumption of and death and diseases resulting from harmful commodities. Moreover, there is a greater need for the public health community to generate consensus about how to ethically engage or not engage with industries that produce unhealthy commodities. More studies are also needed to build the evidence base of industry tactics to resist regulation, particularly in the case of SSB, and in low-and middle-income countries.

Healthy or Not Healthy? A Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluate Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels as a Tool to Guide Consumers

“…For progressive manufacturers, no legal limitation prevents immediate implementation of such an initiative; however, without legislative guidelines, it is unclear what percentage of the market would feel compelled to ‘make it clearer’. The food industry has a poor reputation for taking positive health initiatives through self-regulation [ 60 , 61 , 62 ] and has been implicated in influencing policy processes in many countries [ 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ]. Unfortunately, this intervention will still not aid consumers who lack basic nutritional knowledge to interpret information on food labels.…”

Corporate activities that influence population health: A scoping review and qualitative synthesis to develop the HEALTH-CORP typology

“…The ways in which corporations shape preferences for products and influence perceptions about their health-related risks was another major topic of the included articles. Corporations were accused of promoting excessive consumption of harmful products, for example, by engaging in intensive and highly-resourced marketing campaigns that normalize their consumption (e.g., portraying alcohol as part of a normal everyday routine [84]) [12,18, acquiring or funding media companies, making it more difficult for public health messages to be heard [20,45,48,49,65,72]. Though commercial entities promoted education as the solution to managing health-related risks [20,45,51,58,66,68,74,80], they were also accused of attempting to shape the public's understanding of health issues by providing educational resources that promoted their products and/or downplayed the associated health risks (e.g., alcohol [61,62]) [19,20,36,51,63,65,68,80,84,100].…”

The Founder: Dispositional Greed, Showbiz, and the Commercial Determinants of Health

“…Although contemporary research on the commercial determinants of health has focused on the methods by which unhealthy products are disseminated, including marketing efforts and power-based policy manipulations [81,82], the field has paid little attention to the ways in which individual psychological traits apply at the group level and the ways in which biological and psychological vulnerabilities of consumers make them easy marks for targeted marketing. The absence of the word "greed" in the newly published Oxford University Press textbook The Commercial Determinants of Health, an almost 400-page text about unhealthy commercial activities [15], is emblematic of the void in the field.…”